Works for your subject
Every professor asks: "Can AI really grade my discipline?" Select yours below to see exactly how Ednius handles it.
Nuanced analysis, not keyword matching
Humanities essays require understanding argument structure, evidence quality, and rhetorical sophistication. Ednius evaluates thesis clarity, logical flow, source integration, and originality of thought—not just whether students mentioned the right terms.
Kant's categorical imperative, particularly the universalizability principle, provides a robust framework for ethical reasoning. When we consider whether an action could be universalized without contradiction, we establish a clear test for moral permissibility...
Strong grasp of universalizability. To reach excellence: engage with critiques (e.g., Hegel's abstraction concern) and address conflicting duties.
I was skeptical AI could evaluate argument quality. But the feedback on thesis development and evidence use rivals what I'd write myself—if I had unlimited time.
Partial credit that makes sense
STEM problems have multiple valid solution paths. Ednius doesn't just check final answers—it analyzes methodology, identifies where reasoning went wrong, and awards partial credit for correct approaches even with computational errors.
Forces: mg sin(30°) = ma ✓
a = g sin(30°) = 9.8 × 0.5 = 4.9 m/s² ✓
Normal: N = mg cos(30°) = 2 × 9.8 × 0.87 = 17.1 N
Excellent methodology. Minor note: cos(30°) ≈ 0.866, giving N ≈ 17.0 N. Carry extra precision through calculations.
My engineering students get feedback on their approach, not just whether the final number is right. That's pedagogically what we need.
Beyond "does it compile"
Code grading isn't just about correct output. Ednius evaluates algorithmic efficiency, code style, documentation quality, and software engineering principles. Students learn to write code that's not just functional, but maintainable.
def find_dupes(arr):
seen = set()
dupes = []
for x in arr:
if x in seen: dupes.append(x)
else: seen.add(x)
return dupes
Good O(n) solution. Issues: (1) Use find_duplicates for clarity, (2) Add docstring, (3) Use set for dupes to avoid duplicate duplicates.
The AI catches things autograders miss—inefficient nested loops, unclear naming, missing docstrings. It's like having a TA who actually reads the code.
Strategic thinking, evaluated
Business cases require judgment, framework application, and strategic reasoning. Ednius assesses whether students properly applied analytical frameworks, considered alternatives, and supported recommendations with evidence.
Using Porter's Five Forces, the gaming industry shows high rivalry but opportunities for Netflix's content delivery strengths. Their 230M subscriber base provides distribution advantage...
Strong Porter's analysis. To improve: (1) Address substitutes (mobile gaming), (2) Add VRIO analysis for internal capabilities, (3) Strengthen financial justification.
My MBA students finally get detailed feedback on their strategic thinking, not just a grade. They can see exactly where their reasoning fell short.
Clinical reasoning, assessed
Medical education requires evaluating clinical judgment, differential diagnosis, and patient management decisions. Ednius assesses whether students follow proper diagnostic processes and consider appropriate alternatives.
Primary DDx: Acute MI. Must rule out: PE, aortic dissection, pneumothorax. Workup: ECG, troponins, CXR, CBC, BMP. CT angio if dissection suspected...
Excellent systematic approach. Consider adding: (1) Serial troponin timeline, (2) HEART/TIMI risk scores, (3) Thrombolytic contraindications.
The feedback helps students understand why their clinical reasoning led them astray—not just that they got the diagnosis wrong.
High volume, high quality
Weekly quizzes and short-answer exams mean constant grading. Ednius handles the volume while maintaining feedback quality—students learn from every quiz, not just the ones you had time to comment on.
Mitosis produces identical cells for growth/repair. Meiosis produces gametes with half the chromosomes and involves crossing over. This allows offspring to differ from parents.
Good foundation. Missing: (1) Division count difference, (2) Independent assortment, (3) Evolution connection. See Ch. 9.3 on genetic variation sources.
Finally, feedback that arrives while the quiz is still fresh. I can actually learn from my mistakes instead of just seeing a number.
One platform, every subject
Works across the full spectrum of academic assessment.
Essays & Humanities
Argument structure, thesis quality, evidence evaluation, and rhetorical analysis.
Learn moreSTEM & Mathematics
Multi-step problem solving with partial credit and methodology analysis.
Learn moreComputer Science
Code logic, efficiency analysis, style checking, and best practices review.
Learn moreBusiness & Economics
Framework application, strategic reasoning, and data-driven recommendations.
Learn moreMedical Education
Clinical reasoning, differential diagnosis, and patient management assessment.
Learn moreShort Answer & Quizzes
High-volume processing with instant feedback and knowledge gap identification.
Learn moreSee it work for your course
Book a demo with your actual materials. We'll show you exactly how Ednius handles your discipline.